
Data Quality Matters: 5 Questions Every Research Buyer Should Ask
Filed Under: Advanced Analytics, AI Solutions, Data Quality, Quantitative Research
Todd Eviston
Senior Vice President, Operations
In today’s research landscape, data quality is more critical—and vulnerable—than ever before. The rise of fraudulent respondents threatens the integrity of insights and can lead to misguided strategies and wasted resources. That’s why, at C+R Research, we place data integrity at the heart of everything we do. Our years of experience have taught us that ensuring high-quality data requires proactive measures, advanced tools, and unwavering vigilance.
To help you safeguard your research and make confident business decisions, we recommend asking your research partner five essential questions about their data quality processes and procedures. Informed by our own best practices, these questions (and the answers you should expect) are designed to reveal whether your partner is truly committed to protecting the value of your data.
Your research results are only as strong as the data on which they stand. Data quality doesn’t happen by accident—it demands ongoing dedication and robust systems; it’s not achieved via a one-stop, technology-only solution. Before embarking on your next study, explore these five questions to ensure your research partner is up to the challenge of delivering trustworthy insights.
5 Questions to Ask (and What to Look For)

1. What steps are in place to prevent fraud before surveys launch?
Fraud prevention should start before respondents even see your survey. A sound research partner will implement multiple pre-survey safeguards that screen out problematic respondents at the very beginning.
Look for approaches such as:
- IP address validation to block known fraudulent locations or foreign traffic if not within your research parameters.
- Device ID tracking to detect duplicate participation attempts.
- Language and location checks to ensure respondents match the target audience.
- Digital fingerprinting to identify bots, VPN users, and repeat offenders.
These measures help ensure only qualified, legitimate respondents make it through the “front door,” reducing contamination from the outset.
C+R’s Approach:
These steps are baked into our proprietary Sentinel™ system. We configure the survey platform to block unqualified respondents at the point of entry and embed vendor-level controls to prevent them from ever accessing the survey. Any suspicious traffic is stopped at the “front door,” keeping bots, repeat offenders, and misrepresenting respondents out from the start.
2. How do you monitor respondents during surveys?
Even after pre-screening, respondent behavior can deteriorate during the survey. Your research partner should have real-time monitoring systems in place to catch quality issues as they arise.
This includes:
- Tracking response times to flag respondents who rush through questions.
- Identifying straightlining (selecting the same answer across a battery of questions) and inconsistent responses.
- Reviewing open-ended comments to assess thoughtfulness and relevance.
The research partners should also conduct soft launches, analyzing initial responses to adjust thresholds and catch early issues before full fieldwork begins.
C+R’s Approach:
Sentinel actively monitors respondent behavior in real time. We build surveys with embedded quality checks—timers, hidden validation questions, and consistency tests. During a soft launch phase, we collect a limited number of initial responses and analyze them for quality issues before opening the survey to a full level of data collection. This allows us to adjust thresholds or vendor settings on the fly, ensuring only engaged, qualified respondents continue to full participation.
We also employ advanced analytics to flag subtle patterns that may not be apparent in real-time, combining technology and expertise to protect data integrity mid-stream.
3. How do you validate results after surveys close?
Poor quality isn’t always obvious at first glance, and with today’s sophisticated fraudsters, post-survey review is critical. A quality-conscious research partner doesn’t simply deliver data as-is; they include additional steps to clean and verify results before submitting the data for analysis.
Listen for post-survey practices, such as:
- Reviewing open-end responses to spot nonsensical or copy-pasted answers as well as AI-generated answers.
- Running consistency checks across survey sections to ensure logical patterns.
- Applying advanced statistical tests to detect anomalies or over-represented behaviors.
This final step serves as a last line of defense, catching subtle quality issues that earlier stages may have missed.
C+R’s Approach:
Once fieldwork is complete, Sentinel’s post-survey review begins. Our dedicated data quality team scrutinizes every dataset, including the application of open-end reviews and cross-checking for inconsistencies across sections. Advanced analytics highlight outliers or questionable response patterns. Respondents flagged during this stage are removed before final data delivery, ensuring that what clients see reflects only valid, reliable input. This final review safeguards against hidden fraud that earlier stages may have missed.
4. Who oversees your data quality program?
Technology alone isn’t enough—human expertise and oversight are essential to design, monitor, and refine data quality efforts.
A strong partner will have a dedicated team responsible for data quality, not just a few standard checks buried in operations. Look for a research partner with experienced professionals who:
- Define and enforce clear data quality standards.
- Continuously evaluate emerging fraud tactics and adapt defenses, including the testing and evaluation of fraud prevention tools.
- Actively manage vendor relationships to ensure their practices align with quality expectations.
You should feel confident that knowledgeable people—not just software—are overseeing your project at every stage.
C+R’s Approach:
Our data quality program is managed by a dedicated team whose sole focus is protecting the integrity of your data. This team doesn’t just set rules—they monitor every project, vet every sample vendor, and refine our processes based on evolving challenges. They work hand-in-hand with analysts, suppliers, and clients to ensure that every dataset meets rigorous quality standards, balancing automated tools with informed judgment.
5. How are you evolving to stay ahead of fraud?
Fraudulent tactics evolve quickly, and a static defense won’t suffice. Ask how your research partner keeps their approach current and whether they invest in innovation to stay ahead of threats.
An adaptive research partner will:
- Regularly test and update screening metrics and thresholds.
- Incorporate new tools like AI-powered analysis of open-ends for detecting irrelevant or fabricated responses.
- Conduct research-on-research studies to understand how fraud is changing and assess the effectiveness of their defenses. Watch our webinar where we share our research on research data.
This willingness to learn and improve ensures that the integrity of your data keeps pace with an ever-changing landscape of threats.
C+R’s Approach:
We believe in constant vigilance and innovation. Sentinel is designed to evolve: we adjust thresholds, expand metrics, integrate technology and AI tools—like open-end evaluators that assess whether responses are meaningful or machine-generated. Our ongoing research-on-research initiatives test our assumptions, measure the impact of fraud in real studies, and inform how we adjust our defenses. This commitment to learning ensures that our defenses are always one step ahead of fraud trends, keeping your data safe.
Closing Remarks
At C+R Research, we’ve spent years developing a system to combat the myriad ways poor data quality can undermine market research. C+R’s Sentinel™ Data Quality system is designed to stay ahead of bad actors, ensuring the insights you receive are clean, reliable, and actionable. Asking these five questions helps you confirm that your research partner takes data quality as seriously as you do—because trustworthy data doesn’t happen by accident. It’s the result of thoughtful planning, layered defenses, and continuous improvement.
To learn more about how our multi-layered, adaptive system delivers cleaner, trustworthy data, explore our Data Quality solutions.
explore featured
Case studies
